Wednesday, March 30, 2011

HIST300A: The Horrible Wonder of the Bomb

I want to get the discussion started off with a quote that Fiege uses from one of the nuclear scientists. Isidor Rabi explained, "Physicists are the Peter Pans of the human race. They never grow up, and they keep their curiosity."

What is your reaction to this formulation of scientists? Is Rabi's view of the imaginative power of scientists and their inherent innocence simply trivializing the deeper moral implications of the work of the Manhattan Project? For instance, Rachel Carson normally got lost in the wonder of nature as a child, yet her imagination took her on a very different path, shaped by her sense of morality and protecting humanity.

Or is it not so black and white? By shedding light on this overlooked side of the atomic scientists, what is Fiege trying to do?

HIST300F: Exposing the Occupation of Haiti

Exposes of American imperialism for the purposes of undermining it preceded the Marines' occupation of Haiti in 1915. Still, when we read the "Nation" articles on the occupation, what techniques are used to shed light on the brutality and corruption of the occupation? How might the anti-imperial messages of the articles  differ from the dominant anti-imperialist tropes of those who argued against the post-1898 colonies? How do we account for such differences?


In case you're interested, you may remember my references to the ongoing U.S. military investigation of the "rogue" platoon in Afghanistan, with numerous members being charged with war crimes. These criminal accusations include the premeditated murder of civilians, the planting of weapons on bodies to make them appear to be insurgents, the photographing of "trophy" kills, and the actual taking of body parts as trophies. "Rolling Stone" magazine finally published their investigative article on the war crimes and the cover-up. It's definitely worth reading, especially as we consider these wide-ranging issues of colonial violence, the notion of empire corrupting the morality of Americans overseas, and the public reaction to such revelations. Be advised though, the article, its images, and video are incredibly graphic.


Friday, March 25, 2011

HIST300A: Post-Discussion Thoughts on the Dust Bowl

The notable African-American intellectual, James Baldwin, wrote frequently during the middle of the twentieth century about the social processes by which the "new" immigrants gradually became American. In his estimation, the new immigrants were seduced by the allure of white supremacy as they increasingly loss contact with land and with community. Regimented into the disciplines of industrial work, and having loss previous forms of independence and intimate relationships with land and soil, the new immigrants found white supremacy as the ideal method to gain back the illusion of control in their lives. As Baldwin sees it, white supremacy itself became a confining "factory" for the new immigrants without them even knowing it.
I point to Baldwin's work because it offers us an interesting angle for understanding the social transformations that helped lead to the Dust Bowl in the Southern Plains. Notably, many observers have pointed to this late-nineteenth-century development of American laborers and farmers gradually losing their sense of independence and connections to the land as they were incorporated into industrial and wage-labor sectors. Karita had noted the "suitcase farmers"--who came to the Great Plains to exploit the land but not make a home there-- in her previous post and I want to expand on it here.

Did the farmers of the Southern Plains lose a connection with the land? If they did, as Baldwin suggests about the new immigrants, what did the farmers embrace in order to gain some measure of control over their lives? In the drive to overproduce in excess and overuse the land, did farmers lose a sense of having something more than just capital invested in the landscape? What happens when we, as human beings, only see the land as potential capital?

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

HIST300A: America's Dustbowl

Question: After reading Worster, to what extent do you believe the Dust bowl was an unnatural disaster? Was it inevitable or could it have been avoided?

HIST300F: On Safari with Teddy

Teddy Roosevelt: Now this is "roughing it." (link)

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

HIST300F: Visiting the Philippine Exposition

Stereotypical turn-of-the-century white newsman: This Philippine exposition is the bee's knees, the cat's meow of the whole fair I tells ya!!!  (June 1, 1904 at 2:34 p.m.)

Stereotypical turn-of-the-century white newsman (following race riot between U.S. marines and Filipino scouts): This is not fun. (July 7, 1904 at 3:33 p.m.)









HIST300A: Hornaday's Zoological Nativism

Stereotypical Italian Laborer: Nothing like taking a break from bricklaying by going to the Bronx Zoo. (Sept. 5, 1905 at 3:32 p.m.)

WT Hornaday: Go away. (Sept. 5, 1905 at 3:35 p.m.)

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

HIST300F: Degenerating in the Tropics

After reading the first half of Hoganson and Adas's chapter on the Philippines, both authors offered us examples of how war and empire offered opportunity to American men. After considering those examples, how does Hoganson reveal the rising domestic fears that empire corrupts and causes American men to degenerate? How does Huntington's work on the tropics further reinforce this early-twentieth-century view that the tropics were a corrupting force?

HIST300A: Roosevelt Invents the Big Game Safari

Teddy Roosevelt: After three days on safari, have yet to take quinine--real American men should go into the tropics without any anti-malarial protection. I firmly believe a sound immune system is the sign of sound physical rigor and moral character.   (May 1, 1909 at 7:43 a.m.)

Teddy Roosevelt: Feeling feverish. Probably just the heat. (May 2, 1909 at 1:37 p.m.)

Teddy Roosevelt: Laying down for just a moment to regain my strength. (May 2, 1909 at 6:12 p.m.)

Teddy Roosevelt: Annnnd I vomited. (May 2, 1909 at 6:15 p.m.)